YouWriteOn   The free website to help new writers to develop, and to help talented writers get noticed and published.   Books
   
Rushdie 'not good enough' for Booker shortlist << Return To Main Site

YouWriteOn Message Board > Literary Forums > It Was A Dark And Stormy Night...
Please read the Rules before posting Help Search Recent Posts
Rushdie 'not good enough' for Booker shortlist
Page 1 Start New Topic Reply To Topic
Assignment Robot
 09 Sep 2008, 23:09 #43783 Reply To Post
Rushdie 'not good enough' for Booker


From Booker's best to bottom of the heap ... Salman Rushdie. Photograph: Murdo Macleod

Salman Rushdie's The Enchantress of Florence was simply not a good enough book to make it past the longlist stage of this year's Booker prize, according to the chair of judges, Michael Portillo. To add insult to the double Booker of Booker winner's injured pride, Portillo added that the judges didn't even spend that much time discussing it.

"I can say that the discussions we had about Salman Rushdie, as with all the other books, was a discussion about the book and not about the author. It was about the merits of the book," he told guardian.co.uk after the press conference at which the shortlist was announced.

View Complete Article - Within 4 days not 7

Lawrence Poole
 15 Sep 2008, 18:50 #44054 Reply To Post
Quote: Assignment Robot, Tuesday, 9 Sep 2008 23:09
Rushdie 'not good enough' for Booker


From Booker's best to bottom of the heap ... Salman Rushdie. Photograph: Murdo Macleod

Salman Rushdie's The Enchantress of Florence was simply not a good enough book to make it past the longlist stage of this year's Booker prize, according to the chair of judges, Michael Portillo. To add insult to the double Booker of Booker winner's injured pride, Portillo added that the judges didn't even spend that much time discussing it.

"I can say that the discussions we had about Salman Rushdie, as with all the other books, was a discussion about the book and not about the author. It was about the merits of the book," he told guardian.co.uk after the press conference at which the shortlist was announced.

View Complete Article - Within 4 days not 7



mmm..

I must admit the more often I see Mr Rushdie in the press at one social gathering after another, the less inclined I am to wade through another of his books. His appearance in Bridgit Jones dodn't help matters.

If he wants to be considered an intellectual, worthy of literary attention, why does he behave like such a prat?

'Don't pay any attention to critics - don't even ignore them.' - Sam Goldwyn
sophiemp
 16 Sep 2008, 15:06 #44105 Reply To Post
Quote: Lawrence Poole, Monday, 15 Sep 2008 18:50


If he wants to be considered an intellectual, worthy of literary attention, why does he behave like such a prat?



Someday people will ask the same question about you, Lawrence.
Lawrence Poole
 16 Sep 2008, 17:32 #44110 Reply To Post
Quote: sophiemp, Tuesday, 16 Sep 2008 15:06
Quote: Lawrence Poole, Monday, 15 Sep 2008 18:50


If he wants to be considered an intellectual, worthy of literary attention, why does he behave like such a prat?



Someday people will ask the same question about you, Lawrence.


wanker
'Don't pay any attention to critics - don't even ignore them.' - Sam Goldwyn
sophiemp
 17 Sep 2008, 01:12 #44131 Reply To Post
Quote: Lawrence Poole, Tuesday, 16 Sep 2008 17:32
Quote: sophiemp, Tuesday, 16 Sep 2008 15:06
Quote: Lawrence Poole, Monday, 15 Sep 2008 18:50


If he wants to be considered an intellectual, worthy of literary attention, why does he behave like such a prat?



Someday people will ask the same question about you, Lawrence.


wanker


prat
NickP
 17 Sep 2008, 09:47 #44136 Reply To Post
Quote: sophiemp, Wednesday, 17 Sep 2008 01:12
Quote: Lawrence Poole, Tuesday, 16 Sep 2008 17:32
Quote: sophiemp, Tuesday, 16 Sep 2008 15:06
Quote: Lawrence Poole, Monday, 15 Sep 2008 18:50


If he wants to be considered an intellectual, worthy of literary attention, why does he behave like such a prat?



Someday people will ask the same question about you, Lawrence.


wanker


prat



Welcome to the You Write On Literary Forum, Oscar Wilde and Dorothy Parker.
"...the likes of NickP can rant on if they like"

I occasionally rant on at http://amonsterinthemirror.blogspot.com/
sophiemp
 18 Sep 2008, 02:55 #44198 Reply To Post
Quote: NickP, Wednesday, 17 Sep 2008 09:47
Quote: sophiemp, Wednesday, 17 Sep 2008 01:12
Quote: Lawrence Poole, Tuesday, 16 Sep 2008 17:32
Quote: sophiemp, Tuesday, 16 Sep 2008 15:06
Quote: Lawrence Poole, Monday, 15 Sep 2008 18:50


If he wants to be considered an intellectual, worthy of literary attention, why does he behave like such a prat?



Someday people will ask the same question about you, Lawrence.


wanker


prat



Welcome to the You Write On Literary Forum, Oscar Wilde and Dorothy Parker.


And you, sir, are a tosser.

(I'm learning to speak British.)

NickP
 18 Sep 2008, 07:03 #44202 Reply To Post
Quote: sophiemp, Thursday, 18 Sep 2008 02:55
Quote: NickP, Wednesday, 17 Sep 2008 09:47
Quote: sophiemp, Wednesday, 17 Sep 2008 01:12
Quote: Lawrence Poole, Tuesday, 16 Sep 2008 17:32
Quote: sophiemp, Tuesday, 16 Sep 2008 15:06
Quote: Lawrence Poole, Monday, 15 Sep 2008 18:50


If he wants to be considered an intellectual, worthy of literary attention, why does he behave like such a prat?



Someday people will ask the same question about you, Lawrence.


wanker


prat



Welcome to the You Write On Literary Forum, Oscar Wilde and Dorothy Parker.


And you, sir, are a tosser.

(I'm learning to speak British.)



Your majesty is like a stream of bat's piss...
"...the likes of NickP can rant on if they like"

I occasionally rant on at http://amonsterinthemirror.blogspot.com/
Cordero
 18 Sep 2008, 07:57 #44203 Reply To Post
The whole lot of you are like a dose of clap, or rust in the case of the robot. I didn’t write that; it was one of Wilde’s.
NickP
 18 Sep 2008, 17:28 #44242 Reply To Post
Quote: Cordero, Thursday, 18 Sep 2008 07:57
The whole lot of you are like a dose of clap, or rust in the case of the robot. I didn’t write that; it was one of Wilde’s.


Well, Oscar? We're waiting.
"...the likes of NickP can rant on if they like"

I occasionally rant on at http://amonsterinthemirror.blogspot.com/
Mulberry
 18 Sep 2008, 17:34 #44243 Reply To Post
I wouldn't trust Cordero to sit the right way on a lavatory.

Rowan Atkinson. Belfast. 1979.
Cordero
 18 Sep 2008, 19:21 #44247 Reply To Post
Quote: Mulberry, Thursday, 18 Sep 2008 17:34
I wouldn't trust Cordero to sit the right way on a lavatory.

Rowan Atkinson. Belfast. 1979.


‘This doesn’t surprise me, Cordero.’

‘Oh yeah, is that right, Wilde.’

‘Yes, that is correct. Apparently, you are unable to position your posterior in the appropriate fashion.’

‘Well at least I didn’t get banged up for getting it wrong!’

‘True, dear boy, very true. However, you are not a published author.’

‘I’ll be buggered if I go that far to get my work into print.’

‘There lies the problem.’
awrigley
 18 Sep 2008, 23:19 #44254 Reply To Post
Fight! Fight!

(From Bridgitte Jones, where another fat american spoke proper English)
Page 1 Add To My Topic Watch List Start New Topic Reply To Topic
Server Time: 20 November 2008, 13:58

Powered by Zarr Forums

5 Database Read(s) - 0.391 seconds


Adverts provided by Google and not endorsed by YouWriteOn.com.