YouWriteOn   The free website to help new writers to develop, and to help talented writers get noticed and published.   Books
   
'Offensive' word to be removed from Jacqueline Wilson book << Return To Main Site

YouWriteOn Message Board > Literary Forums > The Book Club
Please read the Rules before posting Help Search Recent Posts
'Offensive' word to be removed from Jacqueline Wilson book
Page 1 Start New Topic Reply To Topic
Assignment Robot
 22 Aug 2008, 14:23 #42434 Reply To Post
'Offensive' word to be removed from Jacqueline Wilson book

After three complaints from parents, Random House is to amend My Sister JodieAlison Flood guardian.co.uk,


Parents' complaints about inappropriate language in Jacqueline Wilson's latest novel My Sister Jodie have persuaded its publisher to replace the offending word.

Random House Children's Books received three complaints from parents about the use of the word "twat" in the book, which is aimed at children aged 10 years and over. Wilson, a former Children's Laureate, is an enormously popular author, and the book has already sold 150,000 copies in the UK since publication in March. But the complaints have meant that the publisher will replace the word with "twit" when it comes to reprint the novel.

Supermarket chain Asda also received a complaint about the novel, which it passed on to Random House, and it is now in the process of withdrawing it from stores until the novel is reprinted. Asda said it had sold over 28,000 copies of My Sister Jodie since it was published, and that the complaint was "the first and only" one it had received.

The book is about Jodie, who is "bold and brash and bad", and her younger sister Pearl. During the course of the novel, when the two girls are sent to boarding school, Jodie becomes interested in a 19-year-old boy who uses the word "twat" in conversation with her.

"The word 'twat' was used in context. It was meant to be a nasty word on purpose, because this is a nasty character," said a spokesperson for Random House. "However ...

View Complete Article
JenniferJay
 22 Aug 2008, 14:32 #42438 Reply To Post
I'm shocked at this kind of censorship. I read the article, and the author used the word twat because the "bad boy" in the novel used the word. What was he supposed to say?
Vagina? I don't like the trend here.
NickP
 22 Aug 2008, 15:19 #42441 Reply To Post
Pathetic.
"...the likes of NickP can rant on if they like"

I occasionally rant on at http://amonsterinthemirror.blogspot.com/
JDSmith
 22 Aug 2008, 16:17 #42447 Reply To Post
Just goes to show how many mums are reading teen lit!
JD
The Publisher
 22 Aug 2008, 17:38 #42452 Reply To Post
I'm amazed Jacqueline Wilson has allowed that.

Any time I felt strongly about a particular word that a copy-editor, proofreader or editor wanted to change in my book, Quercus always deferred to me. Even though even I realized I was sometimes just being bloody minded.
www.keithmansfield.co.uk
johnnymackintosh.com

Johnny Mackintosh and the Spirit of London was published by Quercus on 3 July 2008
Kasia
 23 Aug 2008, 13:24 #42484 Reply To Post
I swear the world has gone mad! On the one hand you’ve got University admissions tutors ranting over the fact that parents attend open days and interviews – and the message is, let your children grow up. Yet you have age guidance on children’s books and this knee jerk reaction to a word. Have any of the parents been on a school playground and listened to the language children use. Children will always use swear words because they hear adults doing it, and children always want to be adults.

We seemed to be a schizoid society – spend more time with your kids; let them be independent and go out and have adventures; don’t let them go out as they might form a gang; stop spending time with your children and let them grow up; get involved in your children’s education; don’t get involved in your children’s education (even though you are footing the bill); police their use of the internet; don’t interfere, they need to stand on their own two feet; discipline your children properly; don’t smack or shout at your children… and on and on….

Parenting should be a private matter not a publicly controlled one, and books should not be censored, nor any arts for that matter. As soon as one publisher bows to this pressure, then eventually all books will be middle of the road, non offensive pulp!
jacobea
 23 Aug 2008, 17:11 #42509 Reply To Post
I agree with Kasia-when i was reading Jacqueline Wilson's books (around age eleven/twelve), us schoolchildren were using much worse words than twat. It's the way things are now and pretty much have always been, although it's not really been written down. People should just accept it, i think.
MLT
 23 Aug 2008, 22:56 #42535 Reply To Post
There always have been and always will be a few parents who are over protective.

I remember an occasion when an irate mother tore up a book borrowed from the school library by her 10 year old son. The cause of her anger? It contained a passage in which one of the child characters made derogatory comments about some women's underwear, belonging to a friend's mother, that was hanging on a clothes line.

That was even more depressing was that the form teacher supported her complaint and said it was unsuitable for a schol library.

I pointed out that the library had to cater for pupils from 10 - 18 years of age so in future she had better supervise her class when they were using it.
k0306
 25 Aug 2008, 22:22 #42605 Reply To Post
There was a piece in The Times about this today, and it said that 'a Random House source' had commented that Jacqueline Wilson was not aware that the word was a reference to 'female genitalia.'

Can this be true?
Page 1 Add To My Topic Watch List Start New Topic Reply To Topic
Server Time: 20 November 2008, 10:56

Powered by Zarr Forums

5 Database Read(s) - 0.328 seconds


Adverts provided by Google and not endorsed by YouWriteOn.com.